The UC Irvine Fiasco News & Analysis
By Kristopher A. Nelson
in September 2007
300 words / 2 min. Belle Lettre writes: Prominent constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky (Duke) was hired to be the inaugural dean of the new law school at UC Irvine… . UCI began a nationwide search for an inaugural dean, and Chemerinsky was one of the finalists–and up till this week, the chosen candidate. However, within a week of […]
Note: this post is from 2007. Evaluate with care and in light of later events.
Belle Lettre writes:
Prominent constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky (Duke) was hired to be the inaugural dean of the new law school at UC Irvine. . . . UCI began a nationwide search for an inaugural dean, and Chemerinsky was one of the finalists—and up till this week, the chosen candidate. However, within a week of hiring him, Chancellor Michael Drake of UCI flew to North Carolina to personally inform Prof. Chemerinsky that UCI would have to rescind the offer.
. . .
But in the wake of this scandalous, cowardly failure to hire Professor Chemerinsky, ostensibly due to his political beliefs, I am embarrassed for my school. I am unhappy that my school is so shortsighted that it has compromised its own commitment to excellence and academic freedom. I am unhappy that it has allowed politics to infect the selection process for the steward of a new law school that was to be devoted to public service and public education. As an alumna of UC Irvine, I am signing the petition to the Chancellor.
Personally, I have no connection to UC Irvine, although I am at a UC-affiliated law school myself. The whole episode just appears ridiculous, honestly, and whatever reason—politics, ideology, money—it seems silly for a new law school to turn down a scholar of Chemerinsky’s reputation and abilities (his book on the Constitution is currently saving my rear in Con Law).
In the past 10-20 years, conservative academics have attempted (in a post-60s backlash, perhaps) to pretend that the liberal establishment runs the university systems. I think this episode might just point out how limited that view is. (I hope so.)