Thomson Reuters Lawsuit Against Zotero Dismissed

By Kristopher Nelson on Jun 5, 2009

: Image via Wikipedia

Sean, a Zotero co-director, announced yesterday that the lawsuit filed by Thomson Reuters (makers of EndNote) was dismissed yesterday:

I’m delighted to announce that this morning the Fairfax Circuit Court dismissed the lawsuit filed against Zotero by Thomson Reuters. The lawsuit had claimed that the Center for History and New Media “reverse-engineered” Thomson Reuters’s EndNote software to provide data interoperability between Zotero and EndNote.

via Thomson Reuters Lawsuit Dismissed at The Quintessence of Ham.

While some are billing this as a victory for open-source software – which, in some sense at least, it is, since it avoids a further attack on this front against Zotero development – the case was never quite about copyright or open source. In its essense, this case instead focused on a contract claim that George Mason University violated the EndNote contract by developing an “import” feature for Zotero. The GMU site license for EndNote (which I understand GMU did not renew) forbid reverse engineering, and Thomson Reuters believed that this was the method used by Zotero’s developers to create the EndNote import function.

Details are still sketchy, but Sean promises to have court transcripts up next week.

Zotero Goes 2.0: Makes Doing Research in Groups Easier (readwriteweb.com)

0 comments 0 people listening

Sign in or Post as Guest

Comment help
Get Livefyre

Sort: Newest | Oldest

Related Posts

New law journal launches that focuses on open source: There's a new law journal in town: "The International Free and Open Source Software Law Review (IFOSS L. Rev.) is a collaborative legal publication aiming to increase knowledge and understanding among lawyers about Free and Open Source Software issues. Topics covered include copyright, licence implementation, licence interpretation, software patents, open standards, case law and statutory changes."
"Open transfer" agreements: mediating industry and universities: Madey v. Duke exposed one conflict when industry and universities work in overlapping areas. The 2002 federal court decision highlighted a problem at the intersection of university and industry goals.
Measuring the impact of technology on the law: It's difficult to come up with more quantitative measurements to look at how technology has impacted law. One could look at the development of new technologies (via patent applications, perhaps?) and then look to see how soon afterwards the invention began to show up in legal cases. Another interesting idea would be to see if changes in technology--the development of new citation systems, more rapid dissemination of decisions and publications, and later the creation of electronic repositories such as Lexis and Westlaw--had any impact on the way lawyers and judges developed law.

About Kristopher Nelson

I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services. Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see krisnelson.org or my Google Profile.

Post Metadata

Post title: Thomson Reuters Lawsuit Against Zotero Dismissed

Authored by: Kristopher Nelson

Categorized as: business • education • law • news • technology

Tagged with: business • education • EndNote • law • library • open source • research • software • terms of service • Thomson Reuters • Zotero

Permalink: http://inpropriapersona.com/thomson-reuters-lawsuit-dismissed-at-the-quintessence-of-ham/

Shortlink: http://wp.me/pxgNP-5C