By krisnelson on Feb 7, 2011 in business / constitution / government / history / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
In the late 19th century, many began to see the rise of monopolistic telegraph operators as more of a threat than the government. Against this potential eavesdropper, the Bill of Rights provided no protection.
Posted in business, constitution, government, history, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged Bill of Rights, constitution, Fourth Amendment, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Jan 25, 2011 in constitution / history / law / privacy / research / science studies / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
There have been four pivotal technologies that have forced modern American law and society to re-examine its notions of privacy and confidentiality.
Posted in constitution, history, law, privacy, research, science studies, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged constitution, Fourth Amendment, history, law, search and seizure, society, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Feb 11, 2010 in law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
There are currently no firm standards on the kinds of Fourth Amendment protections that should apply to cell phone tracking data. This is becoming an issue as GPS and other tracking technologies have been added to cell phone to satisfy E911 requirements, and as police agencies have discovered the potential benefits of mobile-phone location data.
Posted in law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged Department of Justice, EFF, Fourth Amendment, government, Judge Lisa Lenihan, law, privacy, warrants, wireless devices, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Jan 22, 2010 in constitution / law / search and seizure
A federal judge has dismissed Jewel v. NSA, a case from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on behalf of AT&T customers challenging the National Security Agency’s mass surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans’ phone calls and emails.
Posted in constitution, law, search and seizure | Tagged Electronic Frontier Foundation, evidence, government, NSA, warrants, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Jan 18, 2010 in constitution / law / search and seizure
FBI general counsel Valerie Caproni said in an interview Monday that the FBI technically violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act when agents invoked nonexistent emergencies to collect records.
Posted in constitution, law, search and seizure | Tagged constitution, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, FBI, Fourth Amendment, law, privacy, search and seizure, wiretap |
By krisnelson on May 16, 2009 in government / law / wiretap
Image via Wikipedia Domestic wiretaps have dropped by 14 percent from 2007 to 2008. FISA wiretaps are down as well, although the reasons are unclear. Pursuant to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts reports that: A total of 1,891 applications to federal and […]
Posted in government, law, wiretap | Tagged government, law, privacy, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Mar 4, 2008 in law / search and seizure / wiretap
JURIST — Paper Chase: Canada judge rules emergency wiretap law unconstitutional: British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Barry Davies has ruled that Section 184.4 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which allows law enforcement officers to electronically intercept private communications in ‘exceptional circumstances’ without court authorization, is unconstitutional because it violates ‘the fundamental freedom to be free from unreasonable […]
Posted in law, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged Canada, constitution, law, search and seizure, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Feb 20, 2008 in constitution / law / privacy / search and seizure / wiretap
WSJ.com — High Court Says No to Wiretapping, Yes to Exclusionary Rule: Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert in a case that, commentators say, gives them an opporunity to carve out more exceptions to the “exclusionary rule,” a criminal procedure doctrine that excludes evidence obtained from an unlawful search. At the same time, the Court, without comment, turned down […]
Posted in constitution, law, privacy, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged evidence, law, wiretap |