By krisnelson on Feb 8, 2010 in constitution / copyright / featured / intellectual property / law / theory
In reaction to claims that copyright exists to protect creators because of the effort they’ve put into their work, Techdirt points us to a Supreme Court case that clearly says otherwise. History and precedent back it up.
Posted in constitution, copyright, featured, intellectual property, law, theory | Tagged common law, constitution, copyright, history, House of Lords, John Locke, Mike Masnick, Public domain, supreme court, U.S. Supreme Court |
By krisnelson on Aug 17, 2009 in business / constitution / copyright / culture / intellectual property / law / technology
What does it mean to our culture that we have imposed the most draconian restrictions on the reuse of intellectual creations than at any other time?
Posted in business, constitution, copyright, culture, intellectual property, law, technology | Tagged copyright, culture, history, innovation, law, Mike Masnick, Public domain, Techdirt |
By krisnelson on Jun 18, 2009 in constitution / copyright / intellectual property / law / patents
There are many who disagree, but the study appears to raise interesting issues regarding the benefit to society of copyright protections. As Mike Masnick writes, copyright is about balancing benefits (incentives to create with the benefits of distribution).
Posted in constitution, copyright, intellectual property, law, patents | Tagged Congress, constitution, copyright, file sharing, intellectual property, law, Michael Geist, Mike Masnick, patents |