<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>in propria persona &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inpropriapersona.com/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inpropriapersona.com</link>
	<description>Law + tech + history, from a JD/PhD graduate student in the history of science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft update leaves Firefox users unexpectedly vulnerable</title>
		<link>http://inpropriapersona.com/microsoft-update-leaves-firefox-users-unexpectedly-vulnerable/</link>
		<comments>http://inpropriapersona.com/microsoft-update-leaves-firefox-users-unexpectedly-vulnerable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Nelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inpropriapersona.com/?p=914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An add-on that Microsoft silently slipped into Mozilla's Firefox last February leaves that browser open to attack, Microsoft's security engineers acknowledged earlier this week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float:right;" title="Mozilla Firefox" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e3/Firefox-logo.svg/133px-Firefox-logo.svg.png" alt="Mozilla Firefox" width="133" height="127" /></p>
<blockquote><p>An add-on that <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" rel="homepage" href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> silently slipped into Mozilla&#8217;s <a class="zem_slink" title="Mozilla Firefox" rel="geolocation" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=45.1238,-123.1138&amp;spn=1.0,1.0&amp;q=45.1238,-123.1138 (Mozilla%20Firefox)&amp;t=h">Firefox</a> last February leaves that browser open to attack, Microsoft&#8217;s security engineers acknowledged earlier this week.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=5CF0A4A7-1A64-67EA-E45F5A54F2136086">Sneaky Microsoft plug-in puts Firefox users at risk ( &#8211; Internet &#8211; Software &#8211; Security )</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>I suppose somewhere in Microsoft&#8217;s licensing language there is an acknowledgment and release of liability for actions like this. Even so, I certainly don&#8217;t think most Microsoft customers expect updates to so directly compromise 3rd-party programs like Firefox &thinsp;&mdash;&thinsp; and I wonder what Microsoft&#8217;s legal responsibility would be, even with their licensing language, should this kind of action truly result in a major loss?</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=b93cf5ce-76fc-4048-b16e-ca4ebb784f45" alt="" /><span class="zem-script pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inpropriapersona.com/microsoft-update-leaves-firefox-users-unexpectedly-vulnerable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

