By krisnelson on Apr 4, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / search and seizure / wiretap
In Protections for Electronic Communications: the Stored Communications Act and the Fourth Amendment, Alexander Scolnik wrote:
As technology evolves, giving individuals new forms of communicating and government agents increasingly sophisticated tools for surveillance, courts have had to continually interpret the Fourth Amendment and define the extent of its reach in light of these new advances.
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged constitution, Fourth Amendment, Samuel Morse, supreme court, technology, telegraph, Thomas M. Cooley |
By krisnelson on Apr 2, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / search and seizure / wiretap
For the Fourth Amendment – the prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure – one of these foundational cases was Entick v. Carrington (1765). It was not until Katz in 1965 that the Supreme Court returned to the tradition of ex Parte Jackson and held that “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.”
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged Bill of Rights, common law, constitution, Fourth Amendment, Internet, Katz, search and seizure, trespass |
By krisnelson on Mar 11, 2011 in culture / government / history / law / privacy / technology / wiretap
It took nearly 50 years for Justice Brandeis’ ground-breaking law review article on the right to privacy to begin to widely influence judicial decisions. By 1948, though, a dozen or so states had begun to recognize the right as a part of common law.
Posted in culture, government, history, law, privacy, technology, wiretap | Tagged Brandeis, common law, Fourth Amendment, Katz, privacy, publication, trespass, Wilfred Feinberg |
By krisnelson on Feb 21, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
Anuj C. Desai explains that the extension of the Fourth Amendment to cover postal mail, and then later to telephones, is based not so much on the inherently Constitutional nature of opening mail, but instead on the increasingly firm belief in the sanctity of the mail as expressed by Congress, legislators, and the public.
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged confidentiality, Congress, constitution, Fourth Amendment, originalism, search and seizure, supreme court, telegraph |
By krisnelson on Feb 7, 2011 in business / constitution / government / history / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
In the late 19th century, many began to see the rise of monopolistic telegraph operators as more of a threat than the government. Against this potential eavesdropper, the Bill of Rights provided no protection.
Posted in business, constitution, government, history, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged Bill of Rights, constitution, Fourth Amendment, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Jan 25, 2011 in constitution / history / law / privacy / research / science studies / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
There have been four pivotal technologies that have forced modern American law and society to re-examine its notions of privacy and confidentiality.
Posted in constitution, history, law, privacy, research, science studies, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged constitution, Fourth Amendment, history, law, search and seizure, society, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Feb 11, 2010 in law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
There are currently no firm standards on the kinds of Fourth Amendment protections that should apply to cell phone tracking data. This is becoming an issue as GPS and other tracking technologies have been added to cell phone to satisfy E911 requirements, and as police agencies have discovered the potential benefits of mobile-phone location data.
Posted in law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged Department of Justice, EFF, Fourth Amendment, government, Judge Lisa Lenihan, law, privacy, warrants, wireless devices, wiretap |
By krisnelson on May 16, 2009 in government / law / wiretap
Image via Wikipedia Domestic wiretaps have dropped by 14 percent from 2007 to 2008. FISA wiretaps are down as well, although the reasons are unclear. Pursuant to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts reports that: A total of 1,891 applications to federal and […]
Posted in government, law, wiretap | Tagged government, law, privacy, wiretap |