Browse: Home / law / search and seizure
By krisnelson on Apr 4, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / search and seizure / wiretap
In Protections for Electronic Communications: the Stored Communications Act and the Fourth Amendment, Alexander Scolnik wrote:
As technology evolves, giving individuals new forms of communicating and government agents increasingly sophisticated tools for surveillance, courts have had to continually interpret the Fourth Amendment and define the extent of its reach in light of these new advances.
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged constitution, Fourth Amendment, Samuel Morse, supreme court, technology, telegraph, Thomas M. Cooley |
By krisnelson on Apr 2, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / search and seizure / wiretap
For the Fourth Amendment – the prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure – one of these foundational cases was Entick v. Carrington (1765). It was not until Katz in 1965 that the Supreme Court returned to the tradition of ex Parte Jackson and held that “the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.”
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, search and seizure, wiretap | Tagged Bill of Rights, common law, constitution, Fourth Amendment, Internet, Katz, search and seizure, trespass |
By krisnelson on Feb 21, 2011 in constitution / government / history / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
Anuj C. Desai explains that the extension of the Fourth Amendment to cover postal mail, and then later to telephones, is based not so much on the inherently Constitutional nature of opening mail, but instead on the increasingly firm belief in the sanctity of the mail as expressed by Congress, legislators, and the public.
Posted in constitution, government, history, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged confidentiality, Congress, constitution, Fourth Amendment, originalism, search and seizure, supreme court, telegraph |
By krisnelson on Feb 10, 2011 in constitution / history / law / privacy / search and seizure
According to Richards and Solove the “right to privacy” as we now understand it actually grew out of an earlier recognition of the right to confidentiality in certain situations. Warren and Brandeis then took this original principle of confidentiality and shifted it to focus on a newly developed right to privacy.
Posted in constitution, history, law, privacy, search and seizure | Tagged business, constitution, Fourth Amendment, law, privacy, telegraph, United Kingdom |
By krisnelson on Feb 7, 2011 in business / constitution / government / history / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
In the late 19th century, many began to see the rise of monopolistic telegraph operators as more of a threat than the government. Against this potential eavesdropper, the Bill of Rights provided no protection.
Posted in business, constitution, government, history, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged Bill of Rights, constitution, Fourth Amendment, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Jan 25, 2011 in constitution / history / law / privacy / research / science studies / search and seizure / technology / wiretap
There have been four pivotal technologies that have forced modern American law and society to re-examine its notions of privacy and confidentiality.
Posted in constitution, history, law, privacy, research, science studies, search and seizure, technology, wiretap | Tagged constitution, Fourth Amendment, history, law, search and seizure, society, technology, telegraph, wiretap |
By krisnelson on Nov 1, 2010 in history / law / search and seizure / technology
My goal here is to compare and contrast the legal changes that occurred as new technologies – state-run postal services, the telegraph, the telephone, and email, for example – emerged, and through this to seek insight into these larger questions.
Posted in history, law, search and seizure, technology | Tagged archive, courts, Google Scholar, law, LexisNexis, research, search and seizure, technology, Westlaw |
By krisnelson on Apr 23, 2010 in government / law / privacy / search and seizure / technology
It’s always good to remember that storing your email on someone else’s server is a potential problem.
Posted in government, law, privacy, search and seizure, technology | Tagged cloud computing, constitution, Fourth Amendment, law, Orin Kerr, technology, warrant |