RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Cover of How Judges Think
Judge Posner Skewers Textualism-Originalism (Thomas, Scalia), And Reveals the Increasing Politicization of Judging by Conservatives from Brian Tamanaha at Balkinization, quoting from Judge Posner’s new book, How Judges Think:
:This politically conservative response (“originalism” or “textualism-originalism”) — which under different conditions could be a liberal response but is more congenial to conservatives because of its evocation of an era more culturally conservative than today — illustrates a more general tendency of judges to reach backward for the grounds of their decision. By doing so they can if challenged claim to be employing a different methodology that involves deriving conclusions from premises by logical operations as distinct from basing action on a comparison of the social or political consequences of different possible outcomes. But the backward orientation actually enlarges a judge’s legislative scope, and not only by concealing that he is legislating. A judge or Justice who is out of step with current precedents reaches back to some earlier body of case law (or constitutional text) that he can describe as the bedrock, the authentic Ur text that should guide decision. And the older the bedrock, the greater the scope for manipulation of meaning in the name of historical reconstruction or intellectual archeology . …
For more on Judge Posner, see:
- Richard Posner on Wikipedia
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- Other books from Google Books
I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services.
Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see 
