Judge Mukasey is Agnostic on Whether Waterboarding is Lawful

Balkinization – Judge Mukasey is Agnostic on Whether Waterboarding is Lawful:

Just now, in response to repeated questions, he insisted that he did not know enough to say whether waterboarding, or any other technique, is torture, cruel treatment under Common Article 3, or otherwise unlawful. It’s really remarkable how far we have fallen when a jurist of Judge Mukasey’s caliber cannot answer such questions without hesitation.

Amazing. Whichever way he goes on this, clearly he ought to know enough about the law to come down on one side or the other. To be honest, I think he does, which makes this simply a political dodge.



Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Related Posts


About Kristopher Nelson


I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services. Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see krisnelson.org or my Google Profile.

Post Metadata


Post title: Judge Mukasey is Agnostic on Whether Waterboarding is Lawful

Authored by: Kristopher Nelson

Date posted: Oct 18, 2007

Categorized as: governmentlawnews

Tagged with:

Permalink: http://inpropriapersona.com/judge-mukasey-is-agnostic-on-whether-waterboarding-is-lawful/

Shortlink: http://wp.me/pxgNP-2e

Alternate URL: /2007/10/judge-mukasey-is-agnostic-on-whether.html