High Court Says No to Wiretapping, Yes to Exclusionary Rule

WSJ.com – High Court Says No to Wiretapping, Yes to Exclusionary Rule:

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert in a case that, commentators say, gives them an opporunity to carve out more exceptions to the “exclusionary rule,” a criminal procedure doctrine that excludes evidence obtained from an unlawful search. At the same time, the Court, without comment, turned down an appeal from the ACLU that challenged the Bush administration’s warrantless-wiretapping program.



Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Related Posts


About Kristopher Nelson


I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services. Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see krisnelson.org or my Google Profile.

Post Metadata


Post title: High Court Says No to Wiretapping, Yes to Exclusionary Rule

Authored by: Kristopher Nelson

Date posted: Feb 20, 2008

Categorized as: constitutionlawnewsprivacysearch and seizurewiretap

Tagged with:

Permalink: http://inpropriapersona.com/high-court-says-no-to-wiretapping-yes-to-exclusionary-rule/

Shortlink: http://wp.me/pxgNP-30

Alternate URL: /2008/02/high-court-says-no-to-wiretapping-yes.html