I am evaluating a variety of free statistics providers at the moment. If in propria persona seems to be loading slowly, or you notice lots of calls to external sites (especially external tracking scripts), now you’ll know why.
As of right now, these are the stats providers I am looking at:
Hopefully I’ll be able to develop some useful thoughts about these various providers for a future entry.
Does scientific peer review constitute censorship? There is a sense in which peer reviewers -- especially in the sciences -- do act in a kind of censorial capacity.
There's a new law journal in town: "The International Free and Open Source Software Law Review (IFOSS L. Rev.) is a collaborative legal publication aiming to increase knowledge and understanding among lawyers about Free and Open Source Software issues. Topics covered include copyright, licence implementation, licence interpretation, software patents, open standards, case law and statutory changes."
In that 1971 case, New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 US 713, the Court ruled against an attempt by the Nixon Administration "to enjoin the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled 'History of U. S. Decision-Making Process on Viet Nam Policy."
Is scientific peer review censorship?
I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services.
Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see krisnelson.org or my Google Profile. Post title: Free Web Stats Evaluation
Authored by: Kristopher Nelson
Date posted: Jun 9, 2007
Categorized as: blog • technology
Permalink: http://inpropriapersona.com/free-web-stats-evaluation/
Shortlink: http://wp.me/pxgNP-W
Alternate URL: /2007/06/free-web-stats-evaluation.html
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
