RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Google+Peter Suber writes:
Yesterday Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) re-introduced the Fair Copyright in Research Works Act. . . . The premise of the bill, urged by the publishing lobby, is that the NIH policy somehow violates copyright law. The premise is false and cynical. If the NIH policy violated copyrights, or permitted the violation of copyrights, publishers wouldn’t have to back this bill to amend US copyright law. Instead, they’d be in court where they’d already have a remedy.
For more, see:
As well as my law review article on the subject of NIH’s open-access policy, available at SSRN:
I'm currently a graduate student of the history of law and technology at the University of California, San Diego. I also provide law and technology consulting services.
Additionally, I'm a non-practicing lawyer and former developer/sysadmin at a biotech non-profit. For more about me and my work, see 
