<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case of the disappearing case law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inpropriapersona.com/2009/08/the-case-of-the-disappearing-case-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inpropriapersona.com/2009/08/the-case-of-the-disappearing-case-law/</link>
	<description>Law + tech + history, from a JD/PhD graduate student in the history of science.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Nelson</title>
		<link>http://inpropriapersona.com/2009/08/the-case-of-the-disappearing-case-law/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inpropriapersona.com/?p=837#comment-57</guid>
		<description>cloud supporter,

There are indeed potential technical solutions. Many libraries try to capture journal publications by their institutions in repositories to keep an archive outside of the journal alone. The U.S. government has even gotten into this by requiring NIH-funded research to be stored on their system (PubMed) as well as on the systems of private publishers. The Wayback Machine at archive.org is also a good resource.

Still, paper had the benefit of built in massive mirroring: once published, it was difficult to impossible to obliterate a publication (whether that was case law or not). Electronic publication does not have that same in-built defense (although data still tends to stick around electronically anyway).

I&#039;m not sure a gov&#039;t solution is best, or even if we need a solution at all -- but it is unsettling to see the biggest repositories of case law quietly remove a case with no trace remaining on their systems at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cloud supporter,</p>
<p>There are indeed potential technical solutions. Many libraries try to capture journal publications by their institutions in repositories to keep an archive outside of the journal alone. The U.S. government has even gotten into this by requiring NIH-funded research to be stored on their system (PubMed) as well as on the systems of private publishers. The Wayback Machine at archive.org is also a good resource.</p>
<p>Still, paper had the benefit of built in massive mirroring: once published, it was difficult to impossible to obliterate a publication (whether that was case law or not). Electronic publication does not have that same in-built defense (although data still tends to stick around electronically anyway).</p>
<p>I’m not sure a gov’t solution is best, or even if we need a solution at all — but it is unsettling to see the biggest repositories of case law quietly remove a case with no trace remaining on their systems at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloud supporter</title>
		<link>http://inpropriapersona.com/2009/08/the-case-of-the-disappearing-case-law/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>cloud supporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inpropriapersona.com/?p=837#comment-56</guid>
		<description>There are ways to save a website as it was first published or making your own server where one placed on it cannot be edited or taken down. Wikipedia has something like this where the poster of any information must authorize ALL changes. I&#039;m going out on a limb to believe that there is a setting to make it so no changes can be made at all. I&#039;m sure it wouldn&#039;t take much for the government to create something like this and keep it secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are ways to save a website as it was first published or making your own server where one placed on it cannot be edited or taken down. Wikipedia has something like this where the poster of any information must authorize ALL changes. I’m going out on a limb to believe that there is a setting to make it so no changes can be made at all. I’m sure it wouldn’t take much for the government to create something like this and keep it secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 535/537 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via static.inpropriapersona.com

Served from: inpropriapersona.com @ 2012-02-10 01:05:07 -->
